![]() ![]() ![]() We normally use VMWare with CHR – never an issue. now whether CHR includes same network drivers as X86, hard to know without test it. so a little unclear what to expect with Proxmox: Now without passthrough, all the traffic would hit the Linux/Proxmox via a software bridge – likely quick stop, but won't happen on X86 version, maybe the difference in raw speed. PCI passthrough requires multiple ethernet ports since once passthrough, you couldn't get to the Proxmox virtual server if all ethernet ported are passthough'ed. Everything loads in a flash.Īre there any specific settings in proxmox that may affect the performance of the virtualized mikrotik?įirst, I'd look at what CHR virtual machine network settings, specifically the emulated network card on Hyper-V – that should not be that slow if this was all done on same hardware.īut since X86 already works on same hardware, using PCI passthrough for the network card may possible and/or good idea if you're looking to maximize performance. I would prefer CHR because of the licensing model, but I noticed that when working with winbox, it can freeze / hang when importing scripts and navigating and loading the interface is much less responsive. I tested loopback performance: btest (10 seconds average) send udp / tcp and queue test (6x remove & import script for 500 queues). I did some simple tests to choose the most efficient solution for the main router (nat, firewall, queues, pppoe server). We have x10sdv-tp8f + xeon D-1518 + 4Gb ram + 128GB ssd mvme ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |